All hail The King – Pioneer is back, baby.

A few months ago, when I saw the rumors that Pioneer was restarting their professional turntable line, I had to hide a little giddy optimism. Ever since the Technics line was retired nearly half a decade ago, there had been something missing in the turntable lineup available. Then a few months later, this launches:

PLX-1000_alpha

Damn. I’m going to need a moment. That is something else.
I’m all for the retro silver look, but as 21st century turntables go, it’s…beautiful.

Until this launched, there was nothing current in the high-end DJ range. This might sound an odd concern from a non-DJ, but hear me out. Good DJ decks are fantastic for linear listeners:

They’re solid Heavy weight and foot dampeners means no skipping, and a solid platter means with the addition of a good slipmat: Almost no resonance.
They’re tough Mine is 10 years old, battered worse than a cod, yet still keeps dead accurate speed
(Almost) Zero Maintenance No turntable belts. Nothing to wear out. Besides dusting or a catastrophic failure, a high quality torquey direct drive is fantastic.

The important factor between all these attributes is quality. A cheap table will skimp on the materials, reducing the weight, toughness and longevity.
Once the king of the industry left, there was no benchmark. Nobody was making anything quite like the wheels of steel. And possibly the most annoying thing; Used 1200/1210s have been climbing in price ever since. (In a way, confirming the decks as the sm57 of the vinyl scene)

The triumphant return with the PLX-1000 is hopefully the start of a new era.
For a start, it weighs almost 13KG. 13! That’s the same as my amp! If I were a resonant frequency, I’d be looking nervously over my shoulder now. This is excellent, and very much like the old models.
The amount of torque it supplies is ridiculous: 5KG/Cm, compared to the older models 1-2KG is fantastic, and will be a welcome change for those not satisfied with the torque of the 1200, and offers a real alternative to decks traditionally prized for higher torque (Stanton t100s, etc)
Enormous speed variation, whilst not so important to listeners, will be very welcome to jockeys.
And on a slightly smaller note, standard RCA jacks are a welcome addition. No more messing around with too-short non-detachable cables, or dodgy mods to add jacks/longer leads! This might sound silly, but it’s a nice touch. A kensington lock is also a good idea for kit this valuable.

PLX-1000_img4_rear_alpha

Full specs ahoy

All in all, my thoughts? Thoughts? Thoughts…Sorry, I’m a but preoccupied drooling.
I cannot wait to try out this table. Hopefully, this is the triumphant relaunch we have all been waiting for. It also looks pretty sweet with a rubber mat on it. And probably even sweeter with a cork one.

PLX-1000_img2_rubber-mat_alpha

NAS: How hard can it be?

So; I’ve decided that I need a NAS.
It’s one of those situations where, yes, I could do without, but it’s just too cool a thing not to have.

Why do I want it? Two reasons:

Confusion
Storage wastage and access is my biggest annoyance at the moment.
Across all my devices, I probably have 150GB+ of audio files alone.
The problem is, where are they all?

There are FLAC rips on my laptop.
V0 MP3s on my main pc.
ATRAC files on the PS3 (Don’t ask…)
Crappy 128kb/sec WMA encodes I did when I was 12, on an old laptop, that I left at my parents.

files

Everything is everywhere, and when secure FLAC-rips take 30 mins+ , it’s a bit annoying to spend the best part of an hour waiting, only to find a copy you did 6 months ago on your phone.
The plan is to grab every file I have, sort them by format/quality, and bung them on the NAS.
With a bit of bash, I should be able to produce “hitlists” from the files containing sub-optimal audio files, and find the CDs to (re-)rip.

Building a connected world (totally didn’t steal that phrase)
I want to be able to play music/video on multiple devices/XBMC without messing around with keeping certain devices on the network on because they contain the media, or (even worse), wasting storage space duplicating. I also want to be able to pull music straight to a mobile device, maybe even remotely (in the future).

The biggest bonus will be keeping a lead copy of all music in one place, making backups and management more tolerable (or indeed possible). Another big plus will be simplified transcoding; instead of FLAC-ing, then MP3V0-ing when needed on a portable, the process will be automated; whenever FLAC files are dumped, they will be converted and placed in an identical MP3V0 folder. This means I can happily rip away in FLAC, and just grab MP3s when needed.

So, for the audio drive, I decided on the following structure:

Now with 80% more transparency.

This will be managed on a network storage location, either as a pair of Raid1’d drives, or as a logical drive as part of a Raid5 array(most likely, as it allows for more efficient bay use in a microserver). They layout is fairly self-explanatory, and the red arrow between Secure FLAC and MP3 from Secure Flac denotes the transcoding.
I occasionally produce audio projects, so I reasoned I might as well allow for them in storage.

The rest of the NAS will be used for photo, video and document storage, although as these will be merely stores, with no processing, I will gloss over them. Documents and photos will be encrypted and backed up by BackBlaze (I don’t have the heart to make them back up GBs of music for $5 pm)
As for video, it will just be accessible storage. This will mean I can move the TBs of video drives from the main pc, perhaps just leaving one drive for steam games/in process work. Less noise = Excellence.

 

Software:
I’m still not sure!
The original plan was to use Freenas, but it all hinges on ffmpeg support. I think that I can make it work.

FreeNASLogo
The other consideration will be CD ripping: If I can configure a Linux distro to perform headless automated FLAC rips, it would definitely become the target, as that would simplify ripping enormously (drop a disk into the drive, leave it an hour, check folders for fresh FLACs and MP3s). This is a stretch goal.
For the moment, I’ll just continue using EAC under W7, and dumping the FLAC files onto the correct directory for processing.

 

Hardware:
The two front runners at the moment seem to be either a repurposed mid-sized tower, or an HP n40l/n54l, depending on price. I’m leaning towards the hp option, as the running cost should be lower. Both could contain a CD drive.
hpn54l
As I have no plans to perform video encoding on the device (any transcodes would be performed on my gaming rig and uploaded), the 1.5 and 2.2GHz processors of the 40 and 54 respectively should be more than enough, and plenty to perform DLNA of audio (but not video. DLNA video is something I don’t want to even touch).

Another part to consider is networking. I use VM for broadband, but for the traffic between the wired devices in the house, I plan to deploy a separate gigabit switch. Wifi transfers through the VM router should be fast enough, and for any big uploads from the laptop, I can always wire in.

The Future:
Ideally?

Remote access (ssh?) and full dlna support (Not likely, I’m not fond of the video formats dlna supports. Plus, I’d likely need a meatier cpu)

K’Nex K’lean

The idea.

ZPSbd02

This might sound weird, but I love cleaning records. There is something insanely satisfying in picking up a disk cheap, because it’s covered in manky stuff, then cleaning it until it shines.

A great example is the copy of True by Spandau Ballet (don’t laugh), that I picked up for a quid. It looked awful, but for the money, I thought what the hell.
I tried playing it before cleaning (don’t do this normally, I was making science), and it sounded awful. “Gold” sounded more like “Poorly cast aluminium played through a crossley”.
10 minutes with a wet microfibre later, and it sounded like new. There is something really quite nice about that.
Machines exist that will spin and pull dirt off of the record, but they are rather pricey (From where I live, I wouldn’t have change from £60+).

The plan.

I didn’t live in a Lego house. We were a K’Nex family.
And trawling through a SuperU bag in the garage full of it, it came to me. A K’nex frame, which could hold and spin the LP through a tank of water/solution.
My tape measure reckoned 16cm would be enough to lift the LP, so with that in mind, I set to work.

DSC_0208
So far:

The mount is finished.
The gearing is finished(Stepping down the speed by 2.5x).
The motor mount finished.

I tried to make a system that could use a crank or motor. The handle can be retracted (gnng), and the motor attatched. I need to sort some kind to stabilisation bracket for neatness.

LUVqtOH
Future progress.
I need to find/build/steal a tank. Preferably a perspex one.
30cmx3cmx11cm. Not the most common shape.

I think I’m going to need the glue gun. Actually, that’s an excellent excuse to buy one. How crafty.

I also plan to add a microfibre mount. The plan is to make it clamp a cloth, meaning many many cleanings from a poundland special cloth 😀
Schematics:

Haha, no. Not yet.

Once I’ve finished, I see no reason not to 🙂